To be honest, I have been uncertain about whether or not to continue with this theme. There is no question that it has been popular, and last year we measured the pee volume of something like 20 girls, culminating in a compilation of those measurement moments which has also proved a popular item of sale.
The question now is where to go from here? Is there any point in measuring the output of girls when we know they have smaller bladders than girls like Candle and Carissa? No way will they ever reach those levels. I have produced a few such clips this year, notably with Amanda where we tried to expand her capacity. We actually did, from about 400 ml on her first attempt last September to 600 ml on her third try. But still, she will never match Candle! Because buyers know this, there has not been an overwhelming response to the releases, suggesting it may be time to stop.
One person did make a suggestion, and while it seems a good idea on the surface, I am less sure about implementation. He suggested starting a donation fund which accumulates throughout the year, during which period models are made aware of this to encourage them to wait longer and pee more, and at the end of the year, have a winner and two runners up for the fund payout based on maximum pee volume. Seems like fun, but of course many of the models will not stand a chance of winning and they will know that, so they probably would not try. Candle has retired from travelling for shoots now so she would not participate. Carissa is still working, at least for now. Vonka might be in with a chance given that she can produce almost 900 ml now and could probably extend that a little. But in reality, that's probably about it. The average output from the girls is around 600-700 ml, pretty normal for their sizes.
Okay, so we could then divide up the challenge into several ranges, but you can probably see how this would quickly become complicated. Where do you set those boundaries. and what happens if a model crosses from one to the other, winning in the first category (say up to 800 ml) but then becomes a loser in the second (say, 800-1,000 ml) category. Without an absolute scale, fairness could quickly go out of the window.
If I am to consider doing something along these lines, I will need input from interested parties to help me sort out the logistics. If there is no significant response, I shall assume this is a bad idea and let it go, so to speak.